October 29, 2014

Illegal Deduction in the Backfield

by Kenneth Hoffman in Business Counsel, Tax Counsel

The 1985 Chicago Bears were one of the greatest teams in NFL history — in fact, ESPN ranked them the greatest ever. Quarterback Jim McMahon, Hall-of-Fame running back Walter Payton, defensive tackle William "Refrigerator" Perry, and the rest of the team captured America's heart as they sent nine players to the Pro Bowl and shuffled their way to victory in Super Bowl XX.

Hard to believe that was just 29 short years ago. Today's "Monsters of the Midway" are 3-5 after going into hibernation against the New England Patriots this week. They've lost to the Bills, the Packers, the Panthers, and the Dolphins. They're even losing to the Cook County Revenue Department! And that contest illustrates the sort of hair-splitting that seems to define so much of tax law.

In 2003, the Chicago Park District renovated the team's home at Soldier Field. The new venue includes 8,000 "club seats" on the Lake Michigan side of the field that come with all sorts of extra goodies like access to the heated "Club Lounge," parking, and gameday programs. There are also 133 luxury suites that rent for up to $300,000 per year and include private seating, private bathrooms, food and drinks, and even individual temperature controls. (If you've ever shivered through a December game at "the Eyesore on the Lake Shore," you'll realize that heat may be the most valuable perk of all!)

Cook County, where the stadium sits, levies an amusement tax equal to "three percent of the admission fee or other charges paid for the privilege to enter, to witness or to view such amusement." (We're not sure how "amusing" it is to watch Da Bears fall to the lowly Carolina Panthers, but that's a topic for a different day.) However, that tax specifically excludes "any separately stated charges for nonamusement services or sales of tangible personal property."

And that's where it starts getting tricky. How much of the premium ticket price should be subject to that tax and how much should be exempt?

The team broke out a separate "club privilege fee" from the price of the club seats and argued that it shouldn't be taxable because it's separate from the right to enter the stadium and watch the game. As for the luxury suites however, they did not break out a separate fee for the extras, but assigned those seats a flat $104 value and paid the tax on that amount. In 2007, the county threw a penalty flag, holding that it's impossible to separate the extra perks from the price of a seat, and sacked the team for $4.1 million in extra taxes.

Naturally, the Bears challenged the ruling on the field. They took it to an administrative law judge, who sided with the county.

If this had been an on-field call, the Bears would have been allowed just one challenge — and they would have been charged with a timeout too, for losing it! But that's not how it works with taxes. So the team appealed to the replay judges at the Cook County Circuit Court, and won. But now the county had possession. They advanced the ball to the First District Appellate Court, which re-affirmed the tax. (Don't rule out a Hail Mary to the Illinois Supreme Court. And you thought football games have gotten too long!)

Coach Mike Ditka would never have led his '85 Bears to the field without a game plan to minimize his opponents' strengths and take advantage of their weaknesses. It works the same way with your taxes. So call us when you're ready for your own plan. But do it fast! December 31 is closer than you think, and the clock is about to run out on some of the most valuable strategies!

Let's Talk! For a deeper conversation on our services, or to become a client, call Kenneth Hoffman at (954) 591-8290 Monday - Friday for a no cost consultation, or drop me a note.

Kenneth Hoffman of K.R. Hoffman & Co., LLC is a highly sought after tax and business counselor. As a trusted senior advisor and counselor working closely with Entrepreneurs, Professionals and Select Individuals, Mr. Hoffman provides counsel to his clients who are navigating through the complexity of today's business, tax, and accounting challenges.

Click here to schedule an appointment with Kenneth Hoffman.

If you found this article helpful, I invite you to leave a comment and please share it on twitter, facebook or your favorite social media site and with your friends, family and colleagues. Thank you.

I truly value your business and I appreciate your referrals. Refer your family, friends, acquaintances, and business colleagues to KR Hoffman & Co., LLC.

Follow us on Twitter at @TaxReturnCoach, and let us know how we're doing.

September 24, 2014

Lipstick on a Pig?

by Kenneth Hoffman in Tax Counsel, Tax Planning

The personal finance website mint.com reports the average American woman spends $15,000 on makeup in her lifetime, including $3,770 on mascara, $2,750 on eyeshadow, and $1,780 on lipstick. Americans spent $33.3 billion on cosmetics and other beauty products in 2010 alone. ("Being a woman is easy and inexpensive," said no one, ever.)

Our friends at the Internal Revenue Service don't bat an eyelash at all that spending. Cosmetics companies pay billions in taxes. And the product they sell is a nondeductible personal item. But that doesn't stop people from trying — including, we now learn, former United States Senator Scott Brown.

Brown has always been an ambitious sort. In 2010, after a career as a lawyer and state legislator, he won a special election to replace the late Ted Kennedy, becoming the first Republican Senator from Massachusetts since 1972. Then, in 2012, he lost his reelection bid to former Harvard professor Elizabeth Warren. Following his defeat, he moved north to New Hampshire and announced plans to run from the Granite State.

But Brown has always had a bit of a vain streak, too. At age 22, while studying law at Boston College, he won Cosmopolitan's "Sexiest Man in America" contest, posing nude for the magazine's centerfold. So it can't have come as too much of a surprise when he made six years of tax returns available to reporters and revealed that he deducted $2,149 in 2010 and $1,401 in 2011 for "TV makeup and grooming" to help promote his memoirs.

At first blush, deducting makeup might seem perfectly appropriate. Brown probably wouldn't wear it if he hadn't been promoting his book. The problem here is that the rules say that's not enough. IRS Publication 529 reports that you can deduct the cost of work clothes if: 1) "you must wear them as a condition of your employment" and 2) "the clothes are not suitable for everyday wear." Courts have extended this foundation to grooming expenses, holding that they're inherently personal and nondeductible.

Most recently, the Tax Court reviewed the case of Anietra Hamper, who worked as a morning and noon news anchor for WNBS-TV in Columbus. Her station's Women's Wardrobe Guidelines required her to maintain her hair in a neat and professional cut and keep her fingernails at a reasonable length, finished with conservatively colored polish. Yet the Court smeared off thousands in deductions she took for contact lenses, makeup, haircuts, manicures, and teeth whitening.

Last week, a Democratic watchdog group by the name of the American Democracy Legal Fund sent a letter asking the IRS to investigate Brown's deductions and citing a litany of cases holding that personal grooming and makeup expenses are nondeductible. Brown's campaign glossed over the letter as a partisan attack. But Brown is polling about four points behind incumbent Jeanne Shaheen, in a close election that will help determine which party controls the Senate for the final two years of President Obama's administration. This sort of negative publicity can't help Brown's chances. And it does nothing to conceal the stereotype of politicians as slick, blow-dried phonies.

Only time will tell if the IRS takes up Brown's case, or if the controversy affects his election. In the meantime, call us if you're worried about blemishes in your finances. We'll give you the plan you need to look flawless under the hottest lights!

September 17, 2014

Can We Talk?

by Kenneth Hoffman in Tax Planning, Tax Counsel

The world of comedy lost a giant this month. Joan Rivers may have topped out at just 5'2" and weighed 110 pounds soaking wet, but when it comes to influence, she towered above her peers. Rivers established that women can be just as funny as men and paved the way for the Sarah Silvermans and Tina Feys of today. She could alienate people with sometimes-offensive takes on her fellow celebrities. ("Is Elizabeth Taylor fat? Her favorite food is seconds.") But she was never afraid to turn her wit on herself. ("I've had so much plastic surgery, when I die, they will donate my body to Tupperware.")

Rivers hated Washington, and considered herself apolitical. But it's hard to go 50 years in the public eye without having something to say, especially when it comes to taxes. So here are three quick observations:

Money was important to Rivers. ("People say that money is not the key to happiness, but I always figured if you have enough money, you can have a key made.") She worked hard to make it and worked hard to keep it. Back in 2012, she criticized President Obama's proposal to raise taxes: "If I work very hard, I should be able to gather the fruits of my labor." Of course, this was a woman who also said "I'm definitely in favor of a monarchy because they're there, they look good, and always have good gift shops when you leave the palace." So, you might want to take her specific policy recommendations with a grain of salt!
Rivers wasn't afraid to take on the jokers at the IRS. Back in 1993, she lost a Tax Court case involving disability insurance premiums. The dispute established the rule that a corporation can't deduct those premiums on an employee unless there's a contractually binding obligation to pay the benefits to the employee. (We'll skip the details because they're so boring and technical that even she couldn't make them amusing.)
Rivers will get a pretty nice final tax break from the IRS, even though it comes too late for her to enjoy it. Code Section 2053 says that when it comes time to calculating estate tax, you can deduct funeral expenses. And Rivers made it clear that she wanted to go out in style. Here's what she said in her 2012 book, I Hate Everyone . . . Starting with Me:
"When I die, I want my funeral to be a huge showbiz affair with lights, cameras, action. I want Craft services, I want paparazzi and I want publicists making a scene! I want it to be Hollywood all the way. I don’t want some rabbi rambling on; I want Meryl Streep crying, in five different accents. I don’t want a eulogy; I want Bobby Vinton to pick up my head and sing 'Mr. Lonely.' I want to look gorgeous, better dead than I do alive. I want to be buried in a Valentino gown and I want Harry Winston to make me a toe tag. And I want a wind machine so that even in the casket my hair is blowing just like Beyoncé’s."

She may not have gotten the funeral she joked about. But she did get a pack of celebrities, a troupe of bagpipes, and a celebration of a life well lived.

Joan Rivers entertained millions over the course of her career. But there's nothing entertaining about wasting money on taxes you don't have to pay. And you'll get the last laugh if you know you've done everything you can to keep what you make. So call us for a plan to pay less, before the comics at the IRS throw out the punch line for you!

September 10, 2014

No Such Thing As a Free Lunch!

by Kenneth Hoffman in Business Counsel, Tax Counsel

Silicon Valley's high-tech employers are famous for feeding their employees at work. It's not entirely selfless — feeding people helps attract talented workers and keep them chained to their desks. At this point, it's no longer a novelty — it's an expected part of Silicon Valley culture. Companies routinely make headlines for luring away each others' executives and programmers. But back in 2008, Facebook made headlines for poaching Google's chef!

Employers know that if they're going to use lunch to compete for talent, it oughta be good. The average computer nerd may be perfectly happy scarfing down Cheetos in his parents' basement. But six-figure software engineers demand more. So, for example, Google offers employees 30 different "cafes" at their Mountain View campus, serving delicacies like squash-corn-pecan dumplings, and daal saagwala from Northern India: "a mix of soft kale, spinach, and mustard greens, tossed with three types of beans and lentils in a broth singing with distinct cumin notes and a pleasant cilantro flourish." (We suspect that if they had served anything in honor of last month's International Bacon Day, it would have been so insanely good that you could never look a pig in the eye again.)

The best part? It's all free! But that may not be true much longer, if the food critics at the IRS have their way. Last month, they released their 2014-2015 Priority Guidance Plan, which reveals their 317 priority "projects we intend to work on actively during the plan year." And there on Page 7, sandwiched between "Regulations under §86 regarding rules for lump-sum elections" and "Regulations on cafeteria plans under §125," you'll find "Guidance under §§119 and 132 regarding employer-provided meals."

Ironically, free lunches have nothing to do with "cafeteria plans." The relevant regulations at 26 CFR 1.119-1 provide that "The value of meals furnished to an employee by his employer shall be excluded from the employee’s gross income if two tests are met: (i) The meals are furnished on the business premises of the employer, and (ii) the meals are furnished for the convenience of the employer."

Sounds pretty straightforward, right? Marketing software maker Moz.com gives employees a never-ending cereal bar. They serve it at their business headquarters, and they do it to keep employees from running to the In-N-Out Burger down the street. So what's the problem? Well, the IRS thinks that all that Cap'n Crunch may be more than just a convenient employee perk. They're worried that it's actually disguised compensation. And they're licking their chops at the thought of all the tasty revenue they can raise if they're right. (Don't even get them started on that 24-7 on-tap keg at apartmentrental.com!)

If the IRS concludes that meals are part of compensation, they'll be included in employees' W2s and taxed just like the rest of their paychecks. And while the occasional daal saagwala might not sound like much, those meals can add up fast. Let's see here . . . 1,000 employees eating $8 meals, five times per week, adds up to $2 million in new taxable income per year from just this one example — plusmore for Social Security and Medicare. No wonder the carnivores at the IRS are sharpening their knives! (Of course, they'll have to issue even more new regulations telling us how to value all those meals. But bureaucrats love writing regulations even more than they love Cap'n Crunch!)

You may not be worried about all this if you're not getting a free lunch at work. But remember, the IRS has 316 other"priority projects" on its plate. And it's our job to keep an eye out for the ones that hit your wallet. So call us when you're ready for the plan you need to protect yourself from them all!

Let's Talk! For a deeper conversation on our services, or to become a client, call Kenneth Hoffman at(954) 591-8290 Monday - Friday for a no cost consultation, or drop me a note.

Kenneth Hoffman of K.R. Hoffman & Co., LLC is a highly sought after tax and business counselor. As a trusted senior advisor and counselor working closely with Entrepreneurs, Professionals and Select Individuals, Mr. Hoffman provides counsel to his clients who are navigating through the complexity of today's business, tax, and accounting challenges.

Click here to schedule an appointment with Kenneth Hoffman.

If you found this article helpful, I invite you to leave a comment and please share it on twitter,facebook or your favorite social media site and with your friends, family and colleagues. Thank you.

I truly value your business and I appreciate your referrals. Refer your family, friends, acquaintances, and business colleagues to KR Hoffman & Co., LLC.

Follow us on Twitter at @TaxReturnCoach, and let us know how we're doing.

August 30, 2014

It's International Bacon Day!

by Kenneth Hoffman in Tax Counsel

The last Saturday in August is International Bacon Day here in the United States. (Yes, it's really a thing.) Hang your bacon decorations and warm up your voice for carols! IBD is your chance to celebrate all things bacon, like peanut butter-bacon pop tarts, bacon-flavored ice cream, and bacon cocktails. There's even THC-infused chocolate-covered bacon (!) for the Cheech & Chong set. It's all great fun for everyone except the pig.

There's no denying that bacon mania has swept the country. (Cupcakes? Soooo yesterday.) But today's clever chefs are combining all sorts of unexpected ingredients to make all sorts of new dishes. They're drizzling chocolate on things that never went with chocolate. They're deep-frying things that should never, ever be deep-fried. Today's eaters are having more fun with food than at any time since John Montagu, the fourth Earl of Sandwich, decided not to get up from his card game to eat lunch.

What does any of this have to do with taxes? Glad you asked! We've said before that every financial decision you make has at least some tax consequence, even if it's a simple sales tax. So let's look at three random nuggets about food and taxes to whet your appetite for this weekend's global celebration of all things bacon:

What fun is a business meeting without food? Meals and entertainment that include a bona fide business discussion are ordinarily 50% deductible. But claiming a tasty deduction for a delicious meal doesn't have to mean eating at a restaurant. Did you know you may be able to write off the cost of entertaining at your Labor Day barbecue? It's true even if you don't serve bacon. And you don't even need receipts for expenses under $75. Just record who you host, when you host them, how much you spend, your business relationship with your guest, and the specific benefit you hope to gain by hosting them.
Some business meals and entertainment are 100% deductible. You can deduct 100% of your expenses for meals and entertainment for sales seminars and similar events where the meal is integral to the presentation. You can also deduct 100% of the cost of sporting events you organize to benefit charitable organizations, and recreation expenses for your employees. Be generous with those delicious little bacon-wrapped scallops on toothpicks that everyone loves — it's on the IRS!
Switching gears a bit, here's another new food hit. Taco Bell's new Doritos Locos taco is a fiesta wrapped up in a tortilla for customers and tax collectors alike. Taco Bell sold 100 million of the messy faux-Mexican creations in the first ten weeks, and still sells a million a day. In fact, Taco Bell claims the phenomenon is responsible for 15,000 new jobs. And while those probably aren't the sort of high-paying positions that prop up an economy, they still generate millions in federal, state, and local income, payroll, and sales taxes. (Just imagine how many more they would sell if they came with bacon!)

So enjoy International Bacon Day. If you're a vegetarian, help yourself to some tofu "facon." Don't call us for recipes — but do call us with any tax questions before you make important financial decisions. We'll help you get the satisfying results you crave, without any financial gluten, trans fats, or heartburn.

August 21, 2014

Tax Issues When Selling a Gift

by Kenneth Hoffman in Tax Counsel

Receiving a gift is not a taxable event to the one who receives the gift. If the gift is large enough, it could result in gift tax being paid by the donor.

In any case, except for certain gifts or inheritances from foreign sources, you are not to report any gifts you receive to the IRS. This is true whether the gift is in cash or a gift of property.

When you sell the gifted property, you have a whole new story. Your basis (cost) in the property is the same as it was in the hands of the donor. You are considered to have owned the property for as long as the donor owned it, and you also take the donor's cost. This is true for gifts made while the donor is alive. Property received from an estate is treated differently.

So how does this work on your tax return? Let's assume that you received a piece of real estate from your mother three months ago, and the real estate has a current value of $100,000. We will further assume that your mother owned the property for twenty years and had paid $30,000 for it.

If you sell the property this year for $100,000, you will have a long-term capital gain of $70,000 ($100,000 minus your mother's cost of $30,000). You get the favorable long-term capital gain treatment because you are deemed to have owned the property for twenty years.

Let's Talk! For a deeper conversation on our services, or to become a client, call Kenneth Hoffman at (954) 591-8290 Monday - Friday for a no cost consultation, or drop me a note.

Kenneth Hoffman of K.R. Hoffman & Co., LLC is a highly sought after tax and business counselor. As a trusted senior advisor and counselor working closely with Entrepreneurs, Professionals and Select Individuals, Mr. Hoffman provides counsel to his clients who are navigating through the complexity of today's business, tax, and accounting challenges.

Click here to schedule an appointment with Kenneth Hoffman.

If you found this article helpful, I invite you to leave a comment and please share it on twitter, facebook or your favorite social media site and with your friends, family and colleagues. Thank you.

I truly value your business and I appreciate your referrals. Refer your family, friends, acquaintances, and business colleagues to KR Hoffman & Co., LLC.

August 20, 2014

"Gaming the System"?

by Kenneth Hoffman in Business Counsel, Tax Counsel

America's biggest companies fight like tigers for surprisingly tiny advantages. Grabbing as little as a single extra percent of market share can mean millions in new revenue, especially in popular categories like soft drinks or laundry detergent.

The same is true when it comes to taxes. A chief financial officer who cuts his company's tax rate by a percent or two is a hero — and while his name may not make headlines, his paycheck will show it. The Fortune 500 compete for tax planning talent like baseball teams compete for starting pitchers. General Electric is a great example — from 2002 through 2011, it earned billions in profit and paid an average tax rate of just 1.8%. No wonder its tax department has been called "the world's best tax law firm."

Right now, the coolest kids in corporate America's tax departments are all talking about "tax inversions." The strategy involves buying a foreign company headquartered somewhere with lower taxes, then moving their "tax domicile" to the new country while leaving their core business here. Nine U.S. companies have taken the plunge in 2014, and a dozen more are currently weighing it. Take Medtronic, for example. The Minnesota-based pacemaker manufacturer was groaning under a combined 39.1% federal and state tax rate. That's enough to give any CFO a stroke. So what do the tax doctors prescribe? Merge with Covidien, in Ireland. Take advantage of the Emerald Isle's 12.5% rate, and party like it's 1999. The move could save as much as $4.2 billion in U.S. taxes.

If you think this sounds like the sort of move that would upset our friends at the IRS, you're right. (Google "tax inversion + weasel" and you'll get 4,450,000 results.) Last month, President Obama condemned it as "gaming the system," and urged Congress to slam the doors shut, saying "stopping companies from renouncing their citizenship just to get out of paying their fair share of taxes is something that "cannot wait.” Of course, inversions have their champions, too. Defenders point out they're perfectly legal under Internal Revenue Code Section 7874. They argue that the tax savings created by inversions flow through to customers, employees, and shareholders in the form of lower prices, higher wages, and higher profits. And they assert that the deals will help American companies compete against rivals in lower-taxed jurisdictions, protecting jobs and wages.

But not everyone is jumping on the tax inversion bandwagon. This summer, Walgreens announced they would be completing their acquisition of Alliance Boots, Europe's largest pharmacy. Walgreens had contemplated using the deal to move their tax headquarters to Switzerland, but ultimately decided to pass. Since then, the company's stock has dropped 15%. So . . . a mistake? Well, moving could have saved a bundle — as much as $4 billion over the next five years. But it also could have backfired, big time. Executives worried it could spark a decade-long fight with the IRS, chase customers away, and even jeopardize the millions of dollars in federal revenue that Walgreens rakes in from Medicare and Medicaid. Senator Dick Durbin reported he was thrilled that "the corner of happy and healthy" would stay "right here in Illinois."

What do you think? Are the folks who take advantage of tax inversions really "gaming the system," as President Obama has said? Or are they just playing the hand they're dealt, protecting themselves as best they can against the aces up everyone else's sleeves? Whichever you think, remember that we're here to help you play the cards you're dealt. So call us with your questions, and let us help you pay the least tax you can!

July 31, 2014

Holy Taxes, Batman!

by Kenneth Hoffman in Tax Counsel, Tax Planning

On July 23, Batman turned 75! Everyone knows how the billionaire industrialist Bruce Wayne dons a bat-like costume to protect Gotham City from supervillains like The Joker, The Penguin, and The Riddler. But did you know that he's just as resourceful when it comes to fighting The Tax Man, too? Let's use the occasion of the DC Comics character's Diamond Anniversary to see what bat-deductions he can bring to the fight:

Batman may be a brilliant detective and master martial artist, but he can't protect Gotham all by himself. Dick Grayson was the youngest member of the "flying Graysons" acrobat troupe when a mafia boss killed his parents. Batman took Grayson in as his legal ward, and soon Grayson became "Robin." Claiming Robin as a dependent gives Batman a personal exemption, which would reduce his taxable income by $3,950 this year if Batman's high income didn't phase out most of that deduction. But more important, it lets Batman file his taxes using more advantageous "head of household" rates!
Batman and Robin live at stately Wayne Manor, an enormous fortress outside Gotham City. Batman's family has owned the home for generations, which means Batman isn't likely to be paying tax-deductible interest on a mortgage. However, he can deduct an unlimited amount of property tax he pays on the home and grounds, including the Batcave. Oh, and the solar panels Batman installed after the mansion was damaged in an earthquake qualify for a 30% solar investment tax credit.
Alfred Pennyworth is a British actor and former intelligence agent who serves as Batman's butler and best friend. Alfred manages Wayne Manor and cares for the Batcave below. It's not a business relationship, so Batman can't write off Alfred's salary. However, it seems evident that Alfred is required to live on the premises as a condition of his employment — which at least makes his room and board tax-free to him.
When Robin left for college, Batman decided Wayne Manor was a bit too stately for just Alfred and him. So they decamped to a penthouse high atop the Wayne Foundation building in Gotham City. Naturally, the penthouse includes a secret elevator, leading to a secret Batcave, in a secret sub-basement deep under the building. But there's no need to hide anything from the IRS — it also qualifies as a second home, meaning Batman can deduct interest on up to $1 million of "acquisition indebtedness" on the property, plus an unlimited amount of property tax as well.
Batman is one of those rare comic book superheroes without actual superpowers. He can't fly, like Superman, or breathe underwater like Aquaman, or transform himself into an invulnerable green humanoid like The Incredible Hulk. (He can't even make plants grow like the Clorophyll Kid!) But he can harness an arsenal of specially-designed bat-themed gadgets and tools. This includes the fleet of vehicles we all love — the Batmobile, Batplane, Batboat, Bat-sub, and Bat-cycle. And it includes a special utility belt to carry the "batarangs" he uses in lieu of firearms (because a gun killed his parents). Batman's "toys" naturally help him fight crime. But they also help him fight taxes — inventing and producing them qualifies for lucrative Research & Development tax credits and Domestic Production Activity deductions!

Billionaire Bruce Wayne understands that smart tax planning doesn't have to mean revealing his secret identity. We can be sure he uses at least part of the savings to fund his fight against the supervillains! But you don't have to be a millionaire crime-fighting playboy to benefit like he does. Activate your bat-signal — or just pick up your batphone and call us — and we'll give you the plan you need to fight taxes you just don't have to pay.

July 23, 2014

Berkshire Giveaway

by Kenneth Hoffman in Charitable Contributions, Tax Counsel, Tax Planning

Someday, the financial wizards who run things on Wall Street will realize there's "paper to be stacked" opening an Investor Hall of Fame. (Hey, the Rock and Roll Hall makes $40 million a year, and it's in Cleveland.) And when they do, they'll have to dedicate an entire wing to Warren Buffett. The so-called "Oracle of Omaha" has become a rock star among money managers. His chart-topping net worth soared by $37 million per day last year. And his annual Berkshire Hathaway shareholder meeting attracted 40,000 attendees this spring, making it the Burning Man Festival for the cocktail set.

Buffett affects a folksy style, posing for photos with a ukelele and quipping that Wall Street is the only place where people drive Rolls-Royces to get advice from people who ride the subway. But he didn't get to be #2 on the Forbes 400 by being dumb — and this is true with taxes, too. Buffett has made headlines criticizing the carnival of confusion that passes for the "Internal Revenue Code" for taxing his secretary at a higher rate than it taxes him. But his actions show a keen grasp of the power of smart tax planning.

Let's take a look at Buffett's charitable giving. Now, there's no doubt that his motives are sincere — he's pledged to give a whopping 99% of his fortune to charity. But his generosity may have the side benefit of saving him $30 billion or more in tax.

So far this year, Buffett has donated $2.8 billion, including $2.1 billion to the Gates Foundation, $215 million to the Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation, and $150 million each to the Howard G. Buffett Foundation, the Sherwood Foundation, and the NoVo Foundation. But those gifts didn't really "cost" him $2.8 billion. That's because he didn't give cash — he gave Berkshire Hathaway stock. Donating appreciated stock lets Buffett deduct the fair market value of that stock at the time of the gift, even though his "cost basis" — or actual investment in it — is likely to be far, far less. Giving away appreciated stock also lets him avoid tax on the appreciation in that stock.

Let's say Buffett's basis in this year's gift stock was an even billion dollars. (It's probably even less, but who's counting?) If Buffet had sold the stock at a $1.8 billion gain, then given cash, he would have had to pay $712,800,000 in regular tax, plus another $68,400,000 in "net investment income tax." Giving appreciated stock directly, then letting the charities sell it, boosts his largesse by nearly $800 million — money that Buffett evidently thinks his charities can spend better than the folks in Washington.

Buffett probably won't ever "retire" in the go-fishing-in-Florida-and-eat-dinner-at-4 sense of the word. But at some point, he'll get promoted to that great boardroom in the sky. That's when his charity will really sidestep our friends at the IRS. Buffett could set up his heirs for generations to come. But with a 40% estate tax, leaving his current net worth of $58.5 billion to family would cost $23.4 billion in tax. Leaving his wealth to charity avoids that hit. And it spares the rest of us decades of reality TV about spoiled, dissolute heirs — their gilded lifestyles, their trips to rehab, and their endless Paris Hilton-esque shenanigans.

We realize you don't have billions to give like Buffett. But if you're one of the millions of Americans who admire his business wisdom, take a lesson from his tax wisdom as well. And call us before you make any sort of major gift, to your church, your college, or your community. We'll help you structure it to squeeze out the maximum advantage. You can be sure Warren Buffett would approve!

June 18, 2014

Wanna Bet?

by Kenneth Hoffman in Tax Counsel, Tax Planning, Tax Preparation

If you're a golfer, you've surely heard of "Long John" Daly, renowned for his distance off the tee. In 1991, he roared onto the scene by winning the PGA Championship as the ninth alternate. In 1997, he became the first PGA player to average more than 300 yards per drive over a full season. Daly can probably hit the ball farther with a shovel or a rake than we can hit it with Callaway's newest and highest-tech driver. He hasn't won a tournament since 2004, but his legion of fans still love him for his bad-boy, "non-country club" appearance and attitude. And who knows how he might "grip it and rip it" when he becomes eligible for the Senior Tour in 2016?

Daly is a man of many appetites. He's designed golf courses, licensed his own "Loud Mouth" line of clothing, owned a winery, and even recorded an album of his own songs. He's a legendary boozer with seven trips to rehab under his belt — in fact, he's even got a drink named after him. (Take a classic "Arnold Palmer" mix of iced tea and lemonade, add liquor of your choice, and voila, you've got a John Daly.) But his greatest vice may be his gambling. And that's where our friends at the IRS come in.

Daly loves, loves, loves to gamble. He told the gossip site TMZ that it was more about the adrenaline than the money . . . he really just loved the action. He would take out million-dollar markers to hit the blackjack tables, then play seven hands at a time for $15,000 each. In 2006, he lost a playoff to Tiger Woods, drove straight from the tournament in San Francisco to Las Vegas, and dropped $1.65 million in five hours on a $5,000 slot machine. (Hey, we've all been there, right? No?)

The news wasn't all bad. Daly kept detailed records so that when it came time to file his taxes, he could deduct his losses from his wins. So how did he do? Well, according to Daly, he won $35 million from 1991 through 2007. That's pretty good, considering his lifetime tour winnings total just $10,116,306.

There's just one problem. Over that same period, he lost $90 million. Ninety million dollars. For those of you who dropped math as soon as you could, that's a $55 million hole! It took him 10 years to pay off gambling debts, with sponsorship income, hustling appearance money, and "running myself ragged doing corporate outings instead of spending time with my family and working on my game."

And how did Daly come up with those figures? Combing through his tax records, of course! Gambling losses are deductible, sure — but only up to your amount of gambling winnings. That means if you go home a winner, Uncle Sam will be happy to take a cut — but if you've lost, you're on your own. (That's an even better deal than being the casino!)

Daly still loves the action and adrenaline. But, he says, "Now if I gamble, I play the $25 slots. If I hit something, I might move up to $100. But I don't do what I used to do anymore."

You probably won't ever need to check your tax returns to count how much you've lost at the casino. But your tax return is a great source of information on your overall financial health. And penalties for signing an incorrect tax return are lot greater than signing an incorrect scorecard! That's why you can't just file your taxes every year and call it a day. You need a plan to make the most of all your available deductions, credits, and strategies. So call us — we'll keep your taxes out of the rough, and help you avoid those tax bogeys that cost you thousands!